Klinischer Nachweis

Bateman et al. Evidence is building to support using a DACC-coated antimicrobial wound contact layer with NPWT. Wounds UK. 2015; 11:1. Weiterlesen 

Bua N et al. Dialkylcarbamoyl Chloride Dressings in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections after Nonimplant Vascular Surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;44:387-392. Weiterlesen

Chadwick P et al. Bacterial-binding dressings in the management of wound healing and infection prevention: a narrative review. J Wound Care. 2019;28(6):370-382. Weiterlesen

Ciliberti M et al. The Effect of a Bacteria- and Fungi- binding Mesh Dressing on the Bacterial Load of Pressure Ulcers Treated With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: A Pilot Study. Wounds. 2016;28(11):408-420. Weiterlesen

Ciprandi et al. Meeting the Challenges in Pediatric Wound Care: Our 15-Year Experience with Dialkylcarbamoyl Chloride-Coated Dressing Technology in Acute and Chronic Wounds. Chronic Wound Care Management and Research. 2022;9:23-33. Weiterlesen 

Dwiyana et al. Clinical efficacy of dialkylcarbamoylchloride-coated cotton acetate dressing versus combination of normal saline dressing and 2 % mupirocin ointment in infected wounds of epidermolysis bullosa. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(5):e13047. Weiterlesen

Gentili V et al. Panbacterial real-time PCR to evaluate bacterial burden in chronic wounds treated with Cutimed Sorbact. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:1523-1529. Weiterlesen 

Grothier L & Stephenson J. An audit to determine the clinical effectiveness of a pathway for managing wound infection. Wounds UK. 2015;11:30-7. Weiterlesen

Haycocks S & Chadwick P. Use of DACC-coated dressings in diabetic foot ulcers: A case series. Diabet Foot J. 2011;14:133-37.  

Haycocks S et al. Use of a DACC-coated antimicrobial dressing in people with diabetes and a history of foot ulceration. Wounds UK. 2011;7:108-114. Weiterlesen

Husmark J et al. Antimicrobial effects of bacterial binding to a dialkylcarbamoyl chloride-coated wound dressing: an in vitro study. J Wound Care. 2022;31:560-570. Weiterlesen

Kammerlander G et al. An investigation of Cutimed Sorbact as an antimicrobial alternative in wound management. Wounds UK. 2008;4:10-18. Weiterlesen

Lee JW et al. A comparison between DACC with chlorhexidine acetate-soaked paraffin gauze and foam dressing for skin graft donor sites. J Wound Care. 2018;27(1):28-35. Weiterlesen

Ljungh A et al. Using the principle of hydrophobic interaction to bind and remove wound bacteria. J Wound Care. 2006;15(4):175-180.​ Weiterlesen

Mosti G et al. Comparative study of two antimicrobial dressings in infected leg ulcers: a pilot study. J Wound Care. 2015;24:121-122, 124-127. Weiterlesen

Powell Get al. Managing venous leg ulcers using compression therapy and dressings. Br J Nurs. 2015;24(15):S42-S49. Weiterlesen 

Rippon et al. Antimicrobial stewardship strategies in wound care: evidence to support the use of dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)- coated wound dressings. J Wound Care. 2021;30(4):284-296. Weiterlesen

Stephen-Haynes J et al. Cutimed Siltec foam and Cutimed Sorbact gel dressings: a clinical audit. Wounds UK. 2010;6:130-136. Weiterlesen

Susilo YB et al. Significant and rapid reduction of free endotoxin using a dialkylcarbamoyl chloride-coated wound dressing. J Wound Care. 2022;31(6):502-509. Weiterlesen 

Die Nachweise sind zu finden unter “Infektion managen” -Cutimed® Sorbact® Studien.​

Seckam AM et al. Clinical performance and quality of life impact of an absorbent bacteria-binding foam dressing. British Journal of nursing. 2021;30. Weiterlesen

Cutimed^® Siltec^® Science Card

Bateman SD. 150 patient experiences with a soft silicone foam dressing. Br J Nurs. Jun 25-Jul 8, 2015;24(12):S16, S18-23. Weiterlesen

Bateman SD. The challenge of skin tears and lacerations in an emergency environment. Wounds UK. 2014; 10. 94-99. Weiterlesen

King B. A clinical evaluation of 20 patients when using a new absorbent silicone foam wound dressing: Cutimed Siltec B. Wounds UK. 2018;Vol 14. No 3. Weiterlesen

Seckam A. A multicentre, observational evaluation of the product characteristics of two absorbent foam dressings. Br J Nurs. 2019 Jun 27;28(12):S10-S17. Weiterlesen

Cutimed^® Sorbion^® Wissenschaftsfolder

Cutting KF. Managing wound exudate using a super-absorbent polymer dressing: a 53-patient clinical evaluation. Journal of Wound Care. 2009;18(5):200-05. Weiterlesen

Panca M et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of absorbent dressings in the treatment of highly exuding VLUs. J Wound Care. 2013 Mar;22(3):109-10, 112-8. Weiterlesen

Romanelli M et al. A pilot study evaluating the wound and skin care performances of the Hydration Response Technology dressing - a new concept of debridement, J Wound Technology. 2009; Vol. 5.

Romanelli M et al. Exudate management made easy. Wounds Int. 2010; 1(2):1-6. Weiterlesen

Sutherland L. A modern dressing range to meet today's wound care challenges. JCN. 2013;27(5):35-40. Weiterlesen

Todd M et al. Managing ulceration and lymphorrhea in chronic oedema. Br J Community Nurs. 2017;22 Suppl 5(Sup5):S34-S41. Weiterlesen

Jesty J et. al. Assessment in vitro of the active hemostatic properties of wound dressings. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;89:536-542. Weiterlesen 

Sabo M et. al. A Post-marketing Surveillance Study of Chronic Wounds Treated With a Native Collagen Calcium Alginate Dressing. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018; 64:38-43. Weiterlesen

Tati R et al. Biological wound matrices with native dermis-like collagen efficiently modulate protease activity. J Wound Care. 2018;27:199-209. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.4.199. PMID: 29637827. Weiterlesen

Wiegand C et al. A novel native collagen dressing with advantageous properties to promote physiological wound healing. J Wound Care. 2016; 2;25:713-720. Weiterlesen

Derbyshire A. Using a silicone-based dressing as a primary wound contact layer. British Journal of Nursing. 2014;23 Suppl 20: S14-S20. Weiterlesen